 Rank: Newbie
Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/08/2021(UTC)
Posts: 4
|
Hello guys, please your help! I've trying for weeks to do the equivalent WHILE in Smath Studio... a big tool for me. But I really cant figure it out, after watching thousands of videos and web pages. This might be a dumb question, but I'm kinda desperate. I keep getting Z is not defined. See the following captures: Mathcad  Smath Studio  Thank you very much in advance. Regards Edited by user 07 September 2021 23:10:24(UTC)
| Reason: Bad Capture
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2013(UTC) Posts: 1,128  Was thanked: 509 time(s) in 339 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: metrvg  Hello guys, please your help! I've trying for weeks to do the equivalent WHILE in Smath Studio... a big tool for me. But I really cant figure it out, after watching thousands of videos and web pages. This might be a dumb question, but I'm kinda desperate.
I keep getting Z is not defined.
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards SMath vectors/matrices don't start with 0 index. First matrix/vector element gets the index 1. Redesigning your code should make it tick. Either make your indexes +1 or change your range to start with 1. Regards 
|
 1 user thanked overlord for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866  Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
The mountains of Mathcad that I converted for Smath were done simply.
1. From the Mathcad default index 0, save the result.
2. set Mathcad ORIGIN 1
3. Run the program, doctor as indicated by the red message.
I still have a gorgeous Mathcad ORIGIN 0 that couldn't be
converted/doctored ORIGIN 1 ... Damned mystic to me !
Cheers ... Jean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Does it make sense to sanity Smath vs Mathcad more generally ?  Page9 Sanity Mathcad.sm (9kb) downloaded 22 time(s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/08/2021(UTC) Posts: 5 
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Does it make sense to sanity Smath vs Mathcad more generally ? Page9 Sanity Mathcad.sm (9kb) downloaded 22 time(s). when I download the attachment, run it, the error happens : "j is not defined" Is it my PC's problem?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: wty3000 when I download the attachment, run it,
the error happens : "j is not defined"
Is it my PC's problem? PC problem ? Maybe as no visitor reported problem. If so, can't explain ... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2013(UTC) Posts: 1,128 Was thanked: 509 time(s) in 339 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: wty3000 when I download the attachment, run it,
the error happens : "j is not defined"
Is it my PC's problem? Could you please uninstall SMath and delete your smath config directory. Directory should be in "C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Roaming\SMath\". Delete the SMath directory in Roaming completely, purge it. And could you please download new version again and install it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: wty3000 when I download the attachment, run it,
the error happens : "j is not defined" You can probably doctor wrt your SS version. Cheers ... Jean. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/08/2021(UTC)
Posts: 4
|
Guys, thanks for your advices, i've been progressing with Smath... BUT, I reached a new issue... and I still don't get it... i even did the calls step by step marked in red. What can be wrong in the sintax?? Check this out: Mathcad  Smath  Thank you very much in advance! Regards
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2013(UTC) Posts: 1,128 Was thanked: 509 time(s) in 339 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: metrvg What can be wrong in the syntax??
We can't really tell what is the matter without the file. I guess you tried to see the result in same region with the algorithm. Same region result evaluation won't work with multi-line calculations. But it will give you the correct results in a separate evaluation. The syntax seems to appear correct. There is no problem with syntax. When I wrote everything as you did, it just works. Here is your algorithm written from scratch. Regards syntax.sm (6kb) downloaded 12 time(s). Edited by user 15 September 2021 01:35:26(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
1 user thanked overlord for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
