Length of a Matrix Options  Email this topic  Watch this topic  Print this topic » Normal Threaded

Previous Topic Next Topic

Razonar		#1 Posted : 28 February 2019 02:41:15(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)		Hi. Is this the expected behavior? Append.sm (7kb) downloaded 16 time(s). I hope not. I expect A' = [1 2 3 4] Best regards. Alvaro.
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

	Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your SMath Studio Forum forum account. New Registrations are disabled.

Jean Giraud		#2 Posted : 28 February 2019 03:32:07(UTC)
Rank: Guest Groups: Registered Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)		Alvaro: maybe like this ?
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Razonar		#3 Posted : 28 February 2019 03:53:45(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)		Hi Jean. Nope, maybe more like this: BTW, this is a workaround. I expect this result but for the previous syntax. Best regards. Alvaro.
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Jean Giraud		#4 Posted : 28 February 2019 04:20:41(UTC)
Rank: Guest Groups: Registered Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)		Originally Posted by: Razonar Hi Jean. Nope, maybe more like this: You just append, my code inserts wherever needed. My mistake I named Append(,,,) OK, you are imitating MCD. Simpler Append: transpose the row, stack, re-transpose.
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Razonar		#5 Posted : 28 February 2019 04:25:09(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)		Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud ... OK, you are imitating MCD. ... I'm trying to imitate Wolfram's Mathematica Append.
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Jean Giraud		#6 Posted : 28 February 2019 07:59:51(UTC)
Rank: Guest Groups: Registered Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)		Originally Posted by: Razonar I'm trying to imitate Wolfram's Mathematica Append. Not that much miraculous Mathematica 4.0 Mathcad APENDPRN was almost never used. Useful to compact/file a data set with wisely collected the fitting coefficients. On that application, Smath is far superior ... Explain Smath can save same stuff + the formula ... WOW ! Saludad Alvaro [is that correct ?] Page24 Alvaro.sm (16kb) downloaded 15 time(s).
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Davide Carpi		#7 Posted : 28 February 2019 11:48:34(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,647 Location: Italy Was thanked: 1329 time(s) in 875 post(s)		Yes it is correct, or at least it conforms with the general approach of the program (vectors are single column matrices, anything else is a matrix). You might see it better in a 2 rows matrix: The new indices are added expanding the matrix vertically; there is no special case for single-row matrices. For your task, one way could be this: Or this: Edited by user 28 February 2019 12:43:45(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified
		If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects
3 users thanked Davide Carpi for this useful post.		on 28/02/2019(UTC),  on 28/02/2019(UTC),  on 28/02/2019(UTC)
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Jean Giraud		#8 Posted : 28 February 2019 19:22:34(UTC)
Rank: Guest Groups: Registered Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)		...
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Jean Giraud		#9 Posted : 28 February 2019 20:42:13(UTC)
Rank: Guest Groups: Registered Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)		... append this Jacobian matrix.
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Razonar		#10 Posted : 28 February 2019 21:05:51(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)		Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Saludad Alvaro [is that correct ?] Close. Correct it's Saludos Jean. Originally Posted by: Davide Carpi Yes it is correct, or at least it conforms with the general approach of the program (vectors are single column matrices, anything else is a matrix). You might see it better in a 2 rows matrix: Thanks for the explain. You give to me the rule for understand the result. Just as comment, matlab don't follow that, and gives this results: Best regards. Alvaro. Edited by moderator 01 March 2019 21:09:41(UTC)  | Reason: marked as Solved
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Jean Giraud		#11 Posted : 01 March 2019 07:03:18(UTC)
Rank: Guest Groups: Registered Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)		Originally Posted by: Razonar Just as comment, matlab don't follow that, and gives this results: What Matlab does Smath does as well with lot more user specifics. Matlab => MDA [Muliti Dimensional Array] Mathematica => Cell Array They just have their system. I can do whatever from this example and very quick too, just few more modules. MDA_1.bmp (1,076kb) downloaded 15 time(s).
User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Users browsing this topic

Guest