Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login. New Registrations are disabled.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline OchkovVF  
#1 Posted : 14 December 2023 07:35:18(UTC)
OchkovVF


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 06/04/2023(UTC)
Posts: 339
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Here OK Rocket-1.sm (17kb) downloaded 4 time(s).
Here not OK Rocket-2.sm (689kb) downloaded 4 time(s).
About the problem Study-24-How-calculate-Rocket.doc (1,999kb) downloaded 11 time(s).
from the book
https://www.routledge.com/25-Pro...kov/p/book/9780367345259

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your SMath Studio Forum forum account. New Registrations are disabled.

Offline Razonar  
#2 Posted : 14 December 2023 15:58:26(UTC)
Razonar


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,356
Uruguay

Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
Hi Valery. Just use cases() instead if() clauses.

cases.png

Rocket-2.sm (689kb) downloaded 6 time(s).

But Newton's second law is not F=ma which is an expression valid only for systems where m is constant. The general expression given by Newton is F=d(mv)/dt or F=dp/dt with p=mv the linear momentum.

Best regards.
Alvaro.

Edited by user 14 December 2023 16:37:36(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked Razonar for this useful post.
on 14/12/2023(UTC)
Offline OchkovVF  
#3 Posted : 14 December 2023 20:30:08(UTC)
OchkovVF


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 06/04/2023(UTC)
Posts: 339
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Razonar Go to Quoted Post
Hi Valery. Just use cases() instead if() clauses.

But Newton's second law is not F=ma which is an expression valid only for systems where m is constant. The general expression given by Newton is F=d(mv)/dt or F=dp/dt with p=mv the linear momentum.

Best regards.
Alvaro.


Thanks, Alvaro!
One questions.
How can we solve this problem with ODE as F=dp/dt, not F=m dv/dt?
Will we get others (numerical) answer?
Rocket-2.png
Rocket-2-otherwise.sm (691kb) downloaded 2 time(s).

Edited by user 14 December 2023 21:01:15(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline Razonar  
#4 Posted : 15 December 2023 00:32:10(UTC)
Razonar


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,356
Uruguay

Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
The speed of the rocket cannot be independent of the speed at which the propellant exits. Entering that information gives me this solution

Rocket-1.sm (21kb) downloaded 4 time(s).

rock.png

Another way of looking at it, using the equation F = d(mv)/dt, we must take into account that in a rocket the reaction force is not applied to the same body as the action force, as the 3rd Law says, and therefore the temporal derivative of the product mv must be done by changing the reference frame, which is why it is F = m dv/dt + u dm/dt, where v is the speed of the rocket with respect to the inertial reference system attached to the earth, but u is the speed of the propellant with respect to the non-inertial reference system attached to the rocket

Best regards.
Alvaro.

Edited by user 15 December 2023 01:09:20(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline OchkovVF  
#5 Posted : 15 December 2023 00:35:31(UTC)
OchkovVF


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 06/04/2023(UTC)
Posts: 339
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 25 post(s)
New question
Rocket-1.png
Rocket-1.sm (735kb) downloaded 1 time(s).

Edited by user 15 December 2023 00:49:34(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline Razonar  
#6 Posted : 15 December 2023 07:16:32(UTC)
Razonar


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,356
Uruguay

Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
Originally Posted by: OchkovVF Go to Quoted Post
New question...

Hi Valery. You can't take the temporal derivative directly. Please see my previous answer explaining why I think that.

Best regards.
Alvaro.
Offline OchkovVF  
#7 Posted : 15 December 2023 08:39:15(UTC)
OchkovVF


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 06/04/2023(UTC)
Posts: 339
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Razonar Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: OchkovVF Go to Quoted Post
New question...

Hi Valery. You can't take the temporal derivative directly. Please see my previous answer explaining why I think that.

Best regards.
Alvaro.


CM.png
Offline Razonar  
#8 Posted : 15 December 2023 09:25:33(UTC)
Razonar


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,356
Uruguay

Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
Hi Valery. You're right encircling u. Its correct value is u = F/μ. Thus, the force over the rocket is F = - mg - u*dm/dt

rock.png

Rocket-1.sm (24kb) downloaded 6 time(s).

Best regards.
Alvaro.
Offline OchkovVF  
#9 Posted : 15 December 2023 10:04:15(UTC)
OchkovVF


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 06/04/2023(UTC)
Posts: 339
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Thanks, Alvaro.
And what about the 2-stage rocket?
Our first try
Rocket-2.sm (691kb) downloaded 6 time(s).


Offline Razonar  
#10 Posted : 15 December 2023 10:30:05(UTC)
Razonar


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,356
Uruguay

Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
Originally Posted by: OchkovVF Go to Quoted Post
...
And what about the 2-stage rocket?
Our first try


Hi. Your original solution for rocket-1 is ok, and that implies that the movie's solution is also ok.

rock0.png

I was only pointing out the way to deduce it. Writing the relationship for several stages would imply asking for derivatives for functions with cases(), which cannot be done, because although functions can be integrated with cases() or using inside the Mathcad block, they definitely cannot be derived.

So I guess the best solution is the one you gave at the beginning, simply replacing the if() with cases(). The deduction based on physical principles has already been done for one stage. Now it remains to apply the simplified result for several, which is exactly what the rocket-2 case does.

Best regards.
Alvaro.
Offline OchkovVF  
#11 Posted : 15 December 2023 11:00:55(UTC)
OchkovVF


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 06/04/2023(UTC)
Posts: 339
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 25 post(s)
I think it is easier to solve two equations - for two stages, and then for one (last) stage of the rocket.

Online mkraska  
#12 Posted : 15 December 2023 12:58:19(UTC)
mkraska


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,987
Germany

Was thanked: 1124 time(s) in 721 post(s)
Analytical reference solution for h(t) (from a mechanics textbook) and with a single second order DE. in() would be even better without braces (operator form)

Rakete.png
Rakete.sm (22kb) downloaded 7 time(s).
Rakete2.png
Rakete2.sm (22kb) downloaded 13 time(s).
Martin Kraska

Pre-configured portable distribution of SMath Studio: https://smath.com/wiki/SMath_with_Plugins.ashx
Offline OchkovVF  
#13 Posted : 16 December 2023 21:47:47(UTC)
OchkovVF


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 06/04/2023(UTC)
Posts: 339
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 25 post(s)
I would like to publish an article about Rockets in the Journal "Physic in school".
Martin, Rasonar!
Would you like to be coauthors?
See please attach
Polet na Lunu.docx (586kb) downloaded 3 time(s).
Rakete-1.sm (17kb) downloaded 6 time(s).
Rakete-2.sm (18kb) downloaded 6 time(s).

Edited by user 17 December 2023 06:52:02(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked OchkovVF for this useful post.
on 17/12/2023(UTC)
Offline Razonar  
#14 Posted : 17 December 2023 08:10:50(UTC)
Razonar


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,356
Uruguay

Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
Originally Posted by: OchkovVF Go to Quoted Post
I would like to publish an article about Rockets in the Journal "Physic in school".
Martin, Rasonar!
Would you like to be coauthors?
See please attach
Polet na Lunu.docx (586kb) downloaded 3 time(s).
Rakete-1.sm (17kb) downloaded 6 time(s).
Rakete-2.sm (18kb) downloaded 6 time(s).


Hi Valery. Sure. It will be a great experience.

Best regards.
Alvaro.

Offline Jean Giraud  
#15 Posted : 17 December 2023 11:05:30(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
Originally Posted by: OchkovVF Go to Quoted Post
I would like to publish an article about Rockets in the Journal "Physic in school".

The book about Holistic is the rocket model ... works fine in Smath 30405.
Once data will be collected clean, it may be interesting to collect as a function.
A good candidate may be Thiele.
The rocket system does not follow a single DE law, Like ISA.
Thiele fits ISA form - 1km ... 100 km
Jean.

Online mkraska  
#16 Posted : 17 December 2023 11:49:57(UTC)
mkraska


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,987
Germany

Was thanked: 1124 time(s) in 721 post(s)
Originally Posted by: OchkovVF Go to Quoted Post
I would like to publish an article about Rockets in the Journal "Physic in school".
Martin, Rasonar!
Would you like to be coauthors?
See please attach
Polet na Lunu.docx (511kb) downloaded 0 time(s).
Rakete-1.sm (17kb) downloaded 6 time(s).
Rakete-2.sm (18kb) downloaded 6 time(s).


Of course. If I remember correctly, some time there were examples for three-body problems earth-moon-spacecraft. Can't find it just now but that could make another co-author.

Edit: https://en.smath.com/for...d-Toolbox.aspx#post76986

Edited by moderator 19 December 2023 04:37:51(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Martin Kraska

Pre-configured portable distribution of SMath Studio: https://smath.com/wiki/SMath_with_Plugins.ashx
Offline OchkovVF  
#17 Posted : 17 December 2023 21:12:04(UTC)
OchkovVF


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 06/04/2023(UTC)
Posts: 339
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 25 post(s)
> Of course. If I remember correctly, some time there were examples for three-body problems

See see please solutions from Slava

three bodies problem
Offline Jean Giraud  
#18 Posted : 18 December 2023 03:42:27(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Go to Quoted Post
A good candidate may be Thiele.

I tried Cholesky ... Quite good.
For this 6 points Rocket from the book, Holistic works fine.
Unfortunately, we don't have an exportable formula.
Re-Conciliate the project ... Thiele
Jean

Offline OchkovVF  
#19 Posted : 18 December 2023 04:33:09(UTC)
OchkovVF


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 06/04/2023(UTC)
Posts: 339
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Razonar
Hi Valery. Sure. It will be a great experience.

Best regards.
Alvaro.

[/quote wrote:


Thanks, Alvaro!
My email OchkovVF@mpei.ru
Offline Razonar  
#20 Posted : 18 December 2023 13:35:01(UTC)
Razonar


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,356
Uruguay

Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
3 stages variation.

rock0.png

Checking with Tsiolkovsky rocket equation in a gravitational field with several stages

rock0.png

Rakete-3.sm (47kb) downloaded 6 time(s).

Best regards.
Alvaro.

Edited by user 18 December 2023 16:39:32(UTC)  | Reason: Check added

Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.