  Rank: Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/11/2017(UTC) Posts: 17  Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Hello to whole community, I am working on a spreadsheet to calculate the response of a cantilever beam VIA a simple F.E.M solver. I would like to find a solution to modify the part in yellow in the linked spreadsheet, as i dont like its presentation (string and var manipulation).  Modal analysis.sm (86kb) downloaded 22 time(s).Please dont focus on the presentation, it is still an ongoing work  However, i would be glad, if any mistake or optimisation (not liked to my question) is raised. Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,533  Was thanked: 988 time(s) in 617 post(s)
|
Hi. This could be an option. Modal analysis.sm (89kb) downloaded 14 time(s). Best regards. Alvaro.
|
 2 users thanked Razonar for this useful post.
|
on 22/06/2024(UTC), on 24/06/2024(UTC)
|
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 10/11/2010(UTC) Posts: 1,641   Was thanked: 1400 time(s) in 817 post(s)
|
Sometimes I don't understand how it works anymore. The symbolic form of ODE was implemented for simpler expressions. It surprises me that this form of notation calculates anything. |
Russia ☭ forever (git.io/vOZo0)
Viacheslav N. Mezentsev |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/11/2017(UTC) Posts: 17 Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Thank you Alvaro for your answer. That cleaner Another point is: I dont get why i can't use the diff(f,x,i) function in this specific case. Is it due to some way diff function and ' are coded? Regards, Pierre
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,533 Was thanked: 988 time(s) in 617 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Raztua  ...
Another point is: I dont get why i can't use the diff(f,x,i) function in this specific case. Is it due to some way diff function and ' are coded? ... Hi. I don't know the internals of the Viacheslav plugin. But, in any case, you can see how difficult it is to describe the initials conditions with the diff notation in other languages, like maple or mathematica, checking the help of dsolve functions. BTW, the plugin looks like a very powerful tool. For instance, in this file you can find how to solve your system with the classical D(t,x) runge kutta notation. Modal analysis.sm (103kb) downloaded 19 time(s).I guess that the plugin can handle your system because it is lineal and uncoupled. You can see a try to use the mathcad block for solving hard coupled systems at the end of the first post of the Mathcad toolbox, https://en.smath.com/for...726_Mathcad-Toolbox.aspx , in the files RKA. Best regards. Alvaro. Edited by user 9 months ago
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
