  Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/12/2009(UTC) Posts: 248   Location: Cali, Colombia Was thanked: 87 time(s) in 66 post(s)
|
Hi Andrey, I test the new version (0.93) and found the same problem that version 0.92. This is the result from same file. Plotting in 0.91:  Plotting in 0.93:  Regards, Oscar Edited by moderator 20 March 2012 10:33:36(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
  Rank: Administration Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,740  Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
|
Hello Oscar, Here is the same file I reported it was wrong in v0.92 (the same post when you reported your problem).  It seems to me quite right in v0.93. It must have been something else regarding your problem. Can not see what's wrong at the moment. Regards, radovan |
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!" |
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Administration Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,616  Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 666 post(s)
|
This was fixed in 0.93 (the reason was a bug regarding constants).
Regards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/12/2009(UTC) Posts: 248 Location: Cali, Colombia Was thanked: 87 time(s) in 66 post(s)
|
smath wrote:This was fixed in 0.93 (the reason was a bug regarding constants).
Regards. Sorry, but in my post I show that problem persist in 0.93. It is not fixed. Regards, Oscar
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,648  Location: Italy Was thanked: 1331 time(s) in 876 post(s)
|
oscampo wrote:smath wrote:This was fixed in 0.93 (the reason was a bug regarding constants).
Regards. Sorry, but in my post I show that problem persist in 0.93. It is not fixed. Regards, Oscar same results of oscampo with Smath 0.93, win7 http://www.mediafire.com/?6uf36mq2xc0ykvi |
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,616 Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 666 post(s)
|
oscampo wrote:Sorry, but in my post I show that problem persist in 0.93. It is not fixed. Ok. I'll check it. Thank you. Regards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,740 Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
|
Hello, I think I found the problem. It seems it is again regarding Optimization Look at the first picture please:  The blue line is a function of x, as in the Oscar's example. The red line is plotting two column vectors. I used the larger step just to see the difference. Either way the q1(x) has been calculated wrong. Here is another picture with Numerical optimization applied on both q1(x) and for loop.  This time q1(x) has been calculated correctly. Unfortunatelly, the function plot is still wrong and I do not know how to change this. Actually there is a way by using eval()  But another problem appeared. I can not see why the error in the third plot. Separate plot are possible but not the joined plot? Could someone try to reproduce or to explain this, please. Here is the file Oscarplot.sm Regards, Radovan Edited by user 07 March 2012 15:44:37(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!" |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,616 Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 666 post(s)
|
Fixed.  Regards.
|
 2 users thanked Andrey Ivashov for this useful post.
|
on 20/03/2012(UTC), on 20/03/2012(UTC)
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
