Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login. New Registrations are disabled.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Jean Giraud  
#1 Posted : 06 January 2017 19:35:40(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
Lovely surprise: 6179 reveals no granularity wrt test function.
Most interesting compared to 5346 uncomfortable granular.
Thanks Designers !

Jean

Integrate Difficult Parsing.sm (33kb) downloaded 28 time(s).
thanks 1 user thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
on 11/01/2017(UTC)

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your SMath Studio Forum forum account. New Registrations are disabled.

Offline Alex M.  
#2 Posted : 07 January 2017 01:48:27(UTC)
Alex M.


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/03/2014(UTC)
Posts: 418
Canada

Was thanked: 125 time(s) in 96 post(s)
Jean, can you summarize your findings in one or two sentences so I do not need to run both versions of smath to see the difference?

Thanks!

Also advanced math is not my strong suit.
Offline Jean Giraud  
#3 Posted : 07 January 2017 18:29:48(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
Hello Alex,

6179 numerical engine [if we can say so] is much more willing
to calculate in the range that former 5346 could not. In other
words: 6179 is not granular or not yet found for reporting.
Don't hesitate about your "advanced math suite".

Jean

Alex Granularity.sm (22kb) downloaded 22 time(s).

Maths Error 0.207511520256057.sm (32kb) downloaded 23 time(s).
thanks 2 users thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
on 09/01/2017(UTC),  on 11/01/2017(UTC)
Offline Alex M.  
#4 Posted : 09 January 2017 19:55:52(UTC)
Alex M.


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/03/2014(UTC)
Posts: 418
Canada

Was thanked: 125 time(s) in 96 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Go to Quoted Post
Hello Alex,

6179 numerical engine [if we can say so] is much more willing
to calculate in the range that former 5346 could not. In other
words: 6179 is not granular or not yet found for reporting.
Don't hesitate about your "advanced math suite".

Jean

Alex Granularity.sm (22kb) downloaded 22 time(s).

Maths Error 0.207511520256057.sm (32kb) downloaded 23 time(s).



Thanks, Jean. Your worksheet is quite informative and explanatory. I ran into "max number" error couple of times - any progress on reducing its occurance is a good thing

Edited by user 09 January 2017 19:58:55(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline Jean Giraud  
#5 Posted : 10 January 2017 03:14:59(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Alex M. Go to Quoted Post
I ran into "max number" error couple of times


Was not obvious it relates to "granularity".
More annoying was about 'solve bloc' reporting "No real root",
for sure if it couldn't compute !!!

Cheers, Jean
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.