  Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433   Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
Could not find an example short of an article by Urroz in 2010  PumpCurveFittingInSMathStudio.pdf (74kb) downloaded 132 time(s).. He discusses a "LinearDataFit.sm" snippet that I could not find as a download. This sheet Pump Curve Fit.sm (19kb) downloaded 77 time(s). is based off of the data in that PDF file. In Mathcad, I would type "linfit(x,y,F)=" Is there an equivalent? Edited by user 19 April 2016 18:49:36(UTC)
| Reason: Updated file
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/10/2015(UTC)
Posts: 308
Was thanked: 77 time(s) in 58 post(s)
|
Hi, Use this example QuadFit.sm (14kb) downloaded 207 time(s).It was taken from here :http://people.stfx.ca/bliengme/SMath/ Regards Add *.sm file of Pump Curve fit: Pump_Fitting_Curve_Example_a.sm (27kb) downloaded 80 time(s).Edited by user 19 April 2016 23:28:20(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
 1 user thanked CBG for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866  Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: CBG  Use this example <a class="attachedImageLink {html:false,image:false,video:false}" href="/forum/resource.ashx?a=13647 Your Smath version does not digest the algo style that Smath 5346 crunches so well. If that would be the case with versions newer than 5346, it would scrap most of my 400 Smath work sheets. If you have no red from my reply: your are OK, you can read backward. For me, can't read upward your version. For years of update, my Mathematica 4.0 could read newer versions from auto conversion. Most interesting, but unsolved. Jean QuadFit.sm (45kb) downloaded 54 time(s).
|
1 user thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433 Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
CBG's format worked great for me (Thank you). I was going through my MathCAD sheets/notes ...  Jean, for the first time, your algo gave me an error.  Edited by user 20 April 2016 00:18:13(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC) Posts: 296  Location: Khabarovsk, Russia Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
|
Just one character fixes Jean's excellent (as usual) sample: QuadFit (1).sm (41kb) downloaded 114 time(s). |
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski |
1 user thanked mikekaganski for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
"CBG's format worked great for me (Thank you). I was going through my MathCAD sheets/notes ..."
The question is not if CBG works or not in your installation. The problem is
why my work sheet is not compatible to your version. You say it does not work.
Read the error message "Not set to an instance to compute" . So, how many of
the user created function your version won't read ? W/o user programmed functions,
Smath is just a curiosity.
"How simple" from your Mathcad !!! plot and see .
I have same result from OriginLab than Smath. OriginLab was doing gorgeous
fitting much before Mathcad 8/11 , Why? because fitting techniques were developped
between Mathsoft Collabs [especially: Robert, Paul, Jean ...].
"Jean, for the first time, your algo gave me an error".
Yes because your Smath version is not set to read backward version [to be confirmed].
"On a side note, on the picture (very bottom), you define "Poly" at the top of the next graph.
I am olmy familiar with poly and data being on the bottom like the top most picture".
"Poly" is any name to assign the result of the discrete algo.
Cheers, Jean
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Your Mathcad coding is pure invention. It can't be otherwise than it was Mathcad 8/11. Where does that big blue note comes from ? Jean 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433 Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
Jean,
Your coding is phenomenal. Thank you again. Mike found the "character" that was off. I will look for the whole Mathcad sheet and post. I have snippets all over the place and I promised myself to try and be more organized. Not @ computer, but I think in poly:=, the function needed to be f(_x). I took a quick look see but I did not study
|
1 user thanked ElSid for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,654  Location: Italy Was thanked: 1340 time(s) in 879 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ElSid in poly:=, the function needed to be f(_x) Thank you for pointing out where was the issue (and Jean for the code and Mike for the debug too) In fact is not a problem of SS version, I opened the file attached by Jean with 0.97.5346 and I got the same error.  ![2016-04-20 00_26_34-SMath Studio Desktop - [QuadFit.sm_].png](/forum/resource.ashx?a=13659&b=2) Still, I see the screenshot of Jean and I don't understand how it is possible that worked for him. Edited by user 20 April 2016 01:48:13(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/10/2015(UTC)
Posts: 308
Was thanked: 77 time(s) in 58 post(s)
|
ElSid: What is the purpose you are looking for adjusting flow against head? Find a value for a Head with a flow not specified in the flow vector ? , Is it to interpolate ? If it is to interpolate , the easiest thing is to use directly the function " ainterp (V1 , V2, V3 ) " A very simple example: Example_Ainterp.sm (7kb) downloaded 45 time(s).Best Regards
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC) Posts: 296 Location: Khabarovsk, Russia Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Davide Carpi Still, I see the screenshot of Jean and I don't understand how it is possible that worked for him. I'm not sure he had x defined above the screenshoted region at the time of screenshoting |
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski |
1 user thanked mikekaganski for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,654 Location: Italy Was thanked: 1340 time(s) in 879 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: mikekaganski I'm not sure he had x defined above the screenshoted region at the time of screenshoting Good point (it may happens with auto calculation disabled). I think he have to download and evaluate his own attached worksheet and confirm if is still working or not. |
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433 Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: mikekaganski Just one character fixes Jean's excellent (as usual) sample I am look at the fixed file from Mike and comparing it to Jean's original file. The only difference I see between them is the underscore in the function f(_x) in the Poly definition. Totally lost with the - Why the underscore made it work?
- What the recasting of the scalar does?
See screenshot green items.  Edited by user 20 April 2016 04:10:30(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC) Posts: 296 Location: Khabarovsk, Russia Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ElSid I am look at the fixed file from Mike and comparing it to Jean's original file. The only difference I see between them is the underscore in the function f(_x) in the Poly definition. Yes, that's exactly that one character I mentioned above Quote:Why the underscore made it work? Because the "_x" is undefined. Jean used function-as-parameter feature to pass an algo to a function. SMath requires that in this case, the passed function (here it's f(#)) must have its fictive parameters all previously undefined variables. This is very old requirement (I'm unsure if there ever existed a version without it). As Jean has defined "x" above, it coudn't be used as fictive parameter to passed f(). Edit: wrong English error message is reported as SS-2324. Edited by user 20 April 2016 05:31:27(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Hello Collabs , Here is the screen shot of the attached work sheet. My installed Smath 5346 is "as is" from the day it was installed. No download update. Why the underscore would make it work on Elsid version, can't explain. From what you are saying Davide, it looks that if some of the "nightly build" reside in the same machine, it broke logical link to user define function, or code incompatibility between versions. Jean  Poly Quadratic 5346.sm (39kb) downloaded 38 time(s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC) Posts: 296 Location: Khabarovsk, Russia Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
|
This topic discusses the functions-as-parameter thing. You may notice, that it's 6 years old (started 24 Jun 2010), much older than 0.97.5346 (21 August 2014). And yet, all requirements, including requirement that all variables must be previously undefined, are already in place. And yes, as expected, Jean's last file opens fine, because it doesn't contain global definitions of x. Edited by user 20 April 2016 05:52:39(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433 Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
Mike, Thanks for the explanation Originally Posted by: ElSid - ANSWERED
Originally Posted by: mikekaganski - What the recasting of the scalar does?
The screen shot I posted shows it equals nothing ... Multiplying the vectors with the second one being a vector within a vector does not compute in my brain Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Your Mathcad coding is pure invention. It can't be otherwise than it was Mathcad 8/11. Where does that big blue note comes from ? Jean, The Mathcad file I posted in blue does NOT use the same data points, so the polynomial coefficients "b" will be different. I was trying to copy the syntax over to SMath Originally Posted by: CBG What is the purpose you are looking for adjusting flow against head? Great question. I will post the actual files for a project that describe what I am trying to model as soon as I get a copy of the files from the vendors archive (I cannot find my copies). Essentially, it is a VFD driven pump in a wet well, with a min/max elevation drawdown (range) as the wet well goes up and down so looking at min/max. I want to identify the "trapezoid" that the pump must operate in using the "hatching" code in Originally Posted by: ndtma The vendors typically give a "few" data points (some as little as 3). So tying it into one sheet would be phenomenal. Easy to do on paper ... I want to use the affinity rules to go from here. Edited by user 20 April 2016 16:30:42(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,989  Was thanked: 1128 time(s) in 724 post(s)
|
The Maxima plugin provides the function Fit(), see the interactive handbook for details. Fit.sm (15kb) downloaded 88 time(s). |
|
1 user thanked mkraska for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Hello Martin, Very interesting, but does not work in 5346. Your work sheet does not work either. Jean 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ElSid Essentially, it is a VFD driven pump in a wet well, with a min/max elevation drawdown (range) as the wet well goes up and down so looking at min/max.I want to identify the "trapezoid" that the pump must operate in using the "hatching" code in In 1970 I was working in the mning industries and that problem of min/max didn't exist. All our 100's pump box had a little inexpensise level contol. w/o a diagram of what you are attempting, hard to visualise. I don't see the relationship with the "Flood" work sheet , maybe I'm wrong ? Too many bits and pieces in there. Jean
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
