Reselty,
The problem with your demand is that it is not clear what you want to do between the two Mathcad/Smath.
You can distribute Mathcad work sheets to Mathcad users, can make PDF and publish, can select only the
part of the project make image and publish/distribute. But you CAN NOT reverse-Engineer any portion of
Mathcad [License Agreement]. So, nobody at Smath will risk that avenue, and on the other hand it would
mean re-designing Mathcad in Smath style ... just 3 examples [numerical integrators: infinite limit,
singular end point, adaptive, Romberg ... Brent/Ridder scalar derivative operator ... ODE solvers].
You can just do like I do since 10 months: construct Smath work sheets from some of your projects as they
are personal property. On that, since Mathcad 8, 2000, 2001i, 11 [that I know] Mathcad is doing ½ the
job, HOW ? Mathcad has the Microsoft "Clipboard operation".
_ OriginLab does not have the clipboard operation.
_ Mathematica does not have the clipboard operation.
_ Maple does not have the clipboard operation.
What does that mean "Mathcad has the clipboard operation " ?????
It means you can select as long as you want from a Mathcad work sheet and paste in IrfanView and copy
from IrfanView paste in Smath. From there, recreate in Smath style. That's what I do to make my Smath
become my new Engineering tool... free world wide [don't forget donation], from Smath volunteers.
Oh ! you could make *.PDF from Mathcad, just another way to boil eggs.
Don't forget that Mathcad is essentially based on subcontracts for which they pay Royalties:
2D plots, 3D plots, symbolic ... here again: no way to reverse-Engineer code.
Just by itself, Mathcad is a damned dead tool. What make it a great tool is what users have developped.
If you visit Smath "Samples" you will surely find 100's of Smath working projects and tool box. Most of
them are from Mathcad reconstructed Smath style. Example: the Orifice Plate calculations, you will find
nowhere else than in Mathcad 11, Smath. You can pay lot of money for zombie calculators that won't pass
any QA for tracability. Smath 5346 is short of 3D Fourier but it works.
Another important point is about the Symbolic: Your Mathcad 2000 was Maple of the time. Since Smath
started it it based on more recent version of Maple. It made me shit bricks for my InverseLaplace in
modeling controls but finally works as well. There are nuances between old Maple/more recent Maple.
In some ways the old Maple was a bit more conversational to my working habits, but the Smath/Maple is
in other ways more powerful wrt inversing functions ... Example:
Few years ago, I finally found the Platinum Resistance Thermometer formulation [130 years after
Le Châtelier and so many who attempted, including BIMP], workig well in Mathcad 11 but scratching
the left ear with the right hand, scratching rihgt ear with left hand both at same time.
Smath/Maple returned me such an elegant solution for inversing this formula that I dropped dead
for few minutes !
To be frank, Smath is lot more educative than Mathcad as you get what you construct. Smath is more
selfmade man, after all: that's what Scientist/Engineers are.
I started my Engineering life: Paper/pencils/ereaser... then velum paper/better pencils/electric ereaser
and only table of logarithms. What's the problem taking a white page of Smath and go, produce.
Cheers, Jean.