  Rank: Administration Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,617   Was thanked: 1981 time(s) in 667 post(s)
|
It is by design. Procedure (with line on the right side) should be used instead of simple function. 
|
 2 users thanked Andrey Ivashov for this useful post.
|
on 31/03/2016(UTC), on 31/03/2016(UTC)
|
|
|
 Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866  Was thanked: 983 time(s) in 811 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ElSid  The problem is that "vectorize" is not passed through with the function definition It would NOT work in Mathcad 11 either. In your definition, there is nothing to "vectorise", i.e: NO component wise operation. I'm an adept of designing what I want in modular ways. After all, that's what Smath is structured for. Jean 
|
|
|
|
|
|
  Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433  Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Andrey Ivashov It is by design. Procedure (with line on the right side) should be used instead of simple function. How did you get the solid vertical line in front of the function definition? Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud It would NOT work in Mathcad 11 either. In your definition, there is nothing to "vectorise", i.e: NO component wise operation. I'm an adept of designing what I want in modular ways. After all, that's what Smath is structured for.
Jean My Mathcad 14/15 sheets work this way. Your matrix is the programming that goes with the logic. Honestly, these little snippets are golden for me.  I usually take longer in my sheets trying to do what comes naturally to you...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/03/2014(UTC) Posts: 418 Was thanked: 125 time(s) in 96 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ElSid Originally Posted by: Andrey Ivashov It is by design. Procedure (with line on the right side) should be used instead of simple function. How did you get the solid vertical line in front of the function definition? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433 Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
Alex, I tried the programming bar prior to posting my question. Did not work due to two inputs ... Based on your answer, I just went back, did the programing line and deleted the second variable input ... it worked! DUH for me! :'( Logic behind using the programming line for it to work??? Would like to document for my notes other than ... it works 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 983 time(s) in 811 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ElSid My Mathcad 14/15 sheets work this way.
Your matrix is the programming that goes with the logic.
Honestly, these little snippets are golden for me.
I usually take longer in my sheets trying to do what comes naturally to you... All those little snippets I post, are code conversion Mathcad 11 => Smath 5346. Mathcad 11 = rock solid from Mathsoft Mathcad 14/15 = sand dune from PTC, not compatible to read back Mathcad 11, From my virgin PC/Mathcad 11, PTC [some big wheel] reported me by e-mail [I still have it], that my Mathcad 11 crashed their Mathcad 14 !!! Jean
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/04/2016(UTC) Posts: 1 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
