Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login. New Registrations are disabled.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline tedd  
#1 Posted : 09 January 2023 21:22:56(UTC)
tedd

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 9
Location: Canada

I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable answer for this that I'm not seeing, but why does the output of asin() become complex for inputs greater than 1?

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your SMath Studio Forum forum account. New Registrations are disabled.

Offline mkraska  
#2 Posted : 09 January 2023 21:32:40(UTC)
mkraska


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,986
Germany

Was thanked: 1124 time(s) in 721 post(s)
what real angle do you expect to provide sine values > 1?
Martin Kraska

Pre-configured portable distribution of SMath Studio: https://smath.com/wiki/SMath_with_Plugins.ashx
Offline Jean Giraud  
#3 Posted : 09 January 2023 23:19:38(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
Originally Posted by: tedd Go to Quoted Post
but why does the output of asin() become complex for inputs greater than 1 ?

By math design of this function.
BTW, it is fetched from Windows library.

asin(x).PNG

Offline tedd  
#4 Posted : 10 January 2023 02:45:17(UTC)
tedd

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 9
Location: Canada

Originally Posted by: mkraska Go to Quoted Post
what real angle do you expect to provide sine values > 1?


The question I had in mind wasn't why asin() can't evaluate to a real number for inputs greater than 1 radian. It's why it evaluates to a complex number. It wasn't until I looked up the complex form of arcsin on Wikipedia that I knew there even was such a thing. I'm still struggling to visualize it.

I guess that's what comes from being an engineer instead of a mathematician.
Offline Jean Giraud  
#5 Posted : 10 January 2023 04:52:03(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
Revisit the Unit Circle

Circle [ROOTS of UNITY] Copy.sm (19kb) downloaded 4 time(s).
Offline Jean Giraud  
#6 Posted : 10 January 2023 19:31:25(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
Originally Posted by: tedd Go to Quoted Post
It's why it evaluates to a complex number.

Cartesian maths relate x & y, thus solvable within mutual existence.
Above 1 asin(x) is outside the Cartesian system.
Thus, the alternate maths are complex, by nature inaccurate
whereas there is no mutual relationship in blue sky.
Even Cartesian maths may not be accurate when the mutual relationship
confuse each other in infinitesimal values outside distinction.
An example is the Goat radius. Mathematica 4.0 declares max 8 decimals.
In Smath, this example is pretended ~ 12 decimals.
There is another example function having too flat low region.
Cheers ... Jean.

Maths asin(x).sm (7kb) downloaded 2 time(s).
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.