Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.



2 Pages<12
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Jean Giraud  
#21 Posted : 30 January 2023 22:49:27(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,723

Was thanked: 961 time(s) in 789 post(s)
Originally Posted by: evsp Go to Quoted Post
And many respect to Andrey! In the last few days I also found many points where SMath is superior to MathCad.

1. For publishing, Mathcad/Mathsoft MCD 11 is simply different.
2. Speed wise, Smath way behind !
3. Symbolic MCD 11 renders more/less/different than Smath.
4. Data fitting, Integration ... MCD 11 has no competition.
5. For advanced maths, MCD 11 needs much less companion utilities.
Offline overlord  
#22 Posted : 30 January 2023 23:08:03(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2013(UTC)
Posts: 1,043

Was thanked: 444 time(s) in 298 post(s)
Long word short, you can;

- Change optimization of region
- Vectorize() if it is possible
- Use eval() for some formulas
- Re-code your algorithm

Sometimes you can't improve speed.
Even you did everything right.
If speed is crucial for you on iterations;
Use another software, preferably opensource.

thanks 1 user thanked overlord for this useful post.
on 31/01/2023(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.