  Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 10/11/2010(UTC) Posts: 1,432   Was thanked: 1227 time(s) in 711 post(s)
|
include    
Functions: include(1).You can include sm-file containing a simple set of definitions. How to use: include("myfile.sm" )= Note. The dependencies of the include file may differ from the current set of plugins or have different versions. In this case, you need to check that the included file is calculated correctly. Edited by user 08 January 2022 00:21:37(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified uni attached the following image(s): |
Russia ☭ forever
Viacheslav N. Mezentsev |
 5 users thanked uni for this useful post.
|
on 10/11/2013(UTC), on 10/11/2013(UTC), on 10/11/2013(UTC), on 11/11/2013(UTC), on 11/11/2013(UTC)
|
|
|
  Rank: Administration Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,740  Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
|
Thank you uni  I was just playing bit with include(). I just figured out that the hoovering over the include there will be presented the alphabetical order of variables, the variables with dot in its name will be ignored. As I could understand only the assignment of variables will work - but not always (complicated structures will be ignored). Now, there is a bit of problem to kepp the track about which variables have been defined with include(). Maybe a list of them to be available? Regards, Radovan EDIT: Hmm...uni posted this a minute before I posted this one. I will check function definitions - it did not work for me. EDIT1: It is working regarding functions, but the dot in the names is still ignored. Variables are not now in the alphabetical order Edited by user 10 November 2013 10:54:10(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified omorr attached the following image(s): |
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!" |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 10/11/2010(UTC) Posts: 1,432 Was thanked: 1227 time(s) in 711 post(s)
|
I'll fix this later. P.S. I'll remove preprocessing too. Edited by user 10 November 2013 11:19:53(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
Russia ☭ forever
Viacheslav N. Mezentsev |
1 user thanked uni for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 10/11/2010(UTC) Posts: 1,432 Was thanked: 1227 time(s) in 711 post(s)
|
|
Russia ☭ forever
Viacheslav N. Mezentsev |
1 user thanked uni for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,740 Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: uni  Updated. Try now. Yes, it seems ok now. Dot is working inside a variable name. Thank you. Regards, Radovan EDIT: Suppose that units are not handled yet EDIT1: Yes, units are handled now . Edited by user 10 November 2013 19:43:01(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified omorr attached the following image(s): |
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!" |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 10/11/2010(UTC) Posts: 1,432 Was thanked: 1227 time(s) in 711 post(s)
|
|
Russia ☭ forever
Viacheslav N. Mezentsev |
1 user thanked uni for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,822  Was thanked: 1001 time(s) in 641 post(s)
|
uni, Davide,
Could the include() function possibly be combined with the hyperlink region, such that the link points to the sm file to be included (opens in a new window)? One could think of a special region with the option to choose the link target...
Of course, this would just be nice to have, not worth distracting you from more important stuff. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 10/11/2010(UTC) Posts: 1,432 Was thanked: 1227 time(s) in 711 post(s)
|
I think David can do it, combining both our source code. Something like the Reference in Mathcad. |
Russia ☭ forever
Viacheslav N. Mezentsev |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,740 Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: uni Updated. Try now. Thank you. It seems I am just just few moments ahead before you fix all these things. I will just wait and stop bothering you about it for a while Regards, Radovan |
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!" |
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,557  Location: Italy Was thanked: 1279 time(s) in 841 post(s)
|
Nice work Viacheslav  Originally Posted by: mkraska uni, Davide,
Could the include() function possibly be combined with the hyperlink region, such that the link points to the sm file to be included (opens in a new window)? One could think of a special region with the option to choose the link target...
Of course, this would just be nice to have, not worth distracting you from more important stuff. Originally Posted by: uni I think David can do it, combining both our source code. Something like the Reference in Mathcad. I think that a new region derived from our codes should be the way; as additional thing the "maple" region could give an additional contribute (region without input placeholder) BTW actually I'm exploring an unexplored corner of SMATH's API  Edited by user 10 November 2013 21:14:58(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
If you like my plugins please consider a donation to SMath Studio; for personal contributions to me: paypal.me/dcprojects |
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Administration Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,603 Was thanked: 1972 time(s) in 661 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: w3b5urf3r_reloaded BTW actually I'm exploring an unexplored corner of SMATH's API I'm thrilled!  P.S.: Uni, bravo!
|
1 user thanked Andrey Ivashov for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,557 Location: Italy Was thanked: 1279 time(s) in 841 post(s)
|
 Davide Carpi attached the following image(s): |
If you like my plugins please consider a donation to SMath Studio; for personal contributions to me: paypal.me/dcprojects |
2 users thanked Davide Carpi for this useful post.
|
on 11/11/2013(UTC), on 13/11/2013(UTC)
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,822 Was thanked: 1001 time(s) in 641 post(s)
|
Davide, that is simply great! Does that mean that you can define arbitrary operator formats?
Then here is my wish-list
- cases (like sys, just with 2 columns, first value, second condition)
- at (vertical bar with subscript for the location)
- vec (boldfacing and non-scalar-declaration)
Can you make symbolic and numeric evaluation look differently?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,557 Location: Italy Was thanked: 1279 time(s) in 841 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: mkraska Davide, that is simply great! Does that mean that you can define arbitrary operator formats?
Then here is my wish-list
- cases (like sys, just with 2 columns, first value, second condition)
- at (vertical bar with subscript for the location)
- vec (boldfacing and non-scalar-declaration)
Can you make symbolic and numeric evaluation look differently? Andrey's magic interfaces As for now the first is in my plans and is possible to do; the 2nd and the 3rd are interesting but (as first impression) are closest to low-level operators than to functions, so I'm not sure that is possible to have something usable... Are just thoughts, maybe is possible, as usual step-by-step we will discover what we can do... Edited by user 11 November 2013 16:44:20(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified Davide Carpi attached the following image(s): |
If you like my plugins please consider a donation to SMath Studio; for personal contributions to me: paypal.me/dcprojects |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/05/2011(UTC)
Posts: 36
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
|
Awesome! i was waiting for something like this to come along. Much appreciated! the only problem is, i went to your svn link, and... i was confused on what to download/what to do, to add your 'include' extension into my portable version of smath. Can someone please explain what I'm supposed to do to have access to this incredibly nice extension? Thanks, -Pete *edit - i found this link of plugins and extensions with the include plugin listed. http://smath.info/?extensions=SMathStudio_Desktopis this the latest version? cause everytime i try to run it, i get an error - Object Reference not set an instance of an object. I inserted the dll file located above in the plugin folder of my portable smath folder. still getting the same error Edited by user 26 November 2013 23:15:40(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,822 Was thanked: 1001 time(s) in 641 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: sublim21 Awesome! i was waiting for something like this to come along. Much appreciated! the only problem is, i went to your svn link, and... i was confused on what to download/what to do, to add your 'include' extension into my portable version of smath. Can someone please explain what I'm supposed to do to have access to this incredibly nice extension? Thanks, -Pete *edit - i found this link of plugins and extensions with the include plugin listed. http://smath.info/?extensions=SMathStudio_Desktopis this the latest version? cause everytime i try to run it, i get an error - Object Reference not set an instance of an object. I inserted the dll file located above in the plugin folder of my portable smath folder. still getting the same error You can use the inofficial portable distribution, the plugin is included there, see link in my signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/05/2011(UTC)
Posts: 36
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: mkraska
You can use the inofficial portable distribution, the plugin is included there, see link in my signature.
Thanks for providing that portable version Mkraska. Unfortunately, i'm still getting the same error. I just tested your portable on two seperate windows 7 installations, with the following. a test.sm file was created and saved in the portable directory with only the following declaration: testy:5 Then, i tried 'including' this test.sm in another smath page with include( "test.sm" ) = (spaces are included in the above to avoid the emoticons!) and i'm still getting the object reference error. I tried moving the test.sm file to another location "I:\test.sm" and still was getting the same errors on both machines. Any ideas? -Pete Edited by user 27 November 2013 21:43:13(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,822 Was thanked: 1001 time(s) in 641 post(s)
|
I get the object reference error message if the specified file name to include is wrong. File names without path are relative to the directory of the given document. Thus, make sure both docs are in the same directory if there is no path specified. Otherwise you have to specify the full absolute path or a path relative to your current document's directory. PS: uni, would be nice if there was a more specific error message like "file not found" including info on where the file is expected to be (path) Edited by user 28 November 2013 01:13:32(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 10/11/2010(UTC) Posts: 1,432 Was thanked: 1227 time(s) in 711 post(s)
|
Show me log.txt from the plugin directory. Quote:PS: uni, would be nice if there was a more specific error message like "file not found" including info on where the file is expected to be (path) This message should be displayed if the file is not found (from source code where FileName - full path): Code:if ( !File.Exists( FileName ) ) throw new Exception( "File not found: " + FileName );
Unfortunately, I do not understand where it disappears. Object reference error - this is normal situation, but these errors must be hidden. You can see them in log.txt. The latest version for now is 1.0.5062.35981. Edited by user 28 November 2013 19:00:35(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
Russia ☭ forever
Viacheslav N. Mezentsev |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,822 Was thanked: 1001 time(s) in 641 post(s)
|
This is the log contents, if I open caller.sm with a valid include statement and then mess up the file name a little in order to test what happens if I try to include a non-existing file. Quote:28.11.2013 18:05:11 [INFO ] [Plugin.Initialize()] include(1) - include sm-file.
28.11.2013 18:05:11 [INFO ] [Plugin.Initialize()] Successfully. 1 functions loaded.
28.11.2013 18:05:56 [ERROR] Der Objektverweis wurde nicht auf eine Objektinstanz festgelegt.
28.11.2013 18:06:01 [ERROR] [Plugin.ExpressionEvaluation()] include(1) File not found: D:\FHB\Software\SMath\SMath Skript\SMath\Include\efs.sm
28.11.2013 18:06:01 [ERROR] [Plugin.ExpressionEvaluation()] include(1) File not found: D:\FHB\Software\SMath\SMath Skript\SMath\Include\efs.sm
File Attachment(s):  defs.sm (3kb) downloaded 87 time(s).mkraska attached the following image(s): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
