  Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,986  Was thanked: 1124 time(s) in 721 post(s)
|
|
|
 2 users thanked mkraska for this useful post.
|
on 09/03/2014(UTC), on 10/03/2014(UTC)
|
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,647   Location: Italy Was thanked: 1329 time(s) in 875 post(s)
|
plugin's password added in the first post.
Best regards,
Davide |
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,986 Was thanked: 1124 time(s) in 721 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: w3b5urf3r_reloaded  Thank you Martin,
you are right, I'll try to fix it... This seems to be a matter of the perturbation size. File Attachment(s): mkraska attached the following image(s): |
|
1 user thanked mkraska for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,647 Location: Italy Was thanked: 1329 time(s) in 875 post(s)
|
PLUGIN UPDATED SMath Studio 0.97.5346, SMath Studio 0.97.5737, SMath Studio 0.98- Unknowns() now can be used inside functions (will returns 0 if no unknowns are found, instead of an error message); - version numbering switched to 1.1.* to made easier to publish updates for different SS versions (next milestone: 1.2.*); - password no longer required for those SS versions; Edited by user 03 March 2016 21:36:42(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects |
2 users thanked Davide Carpi for this useful post.
|
on 03/03/2016(UTC), on 03/03/2016(UTC)
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/03/2014(UTC) Posts: 418  Was thanked: 125 time(s) in 96 post(s)
|
Hello Davide, I am somewhat confused why FindRoot() cannot solve this equation. Am I doing something incorrectly? It works just fine for some other equations.. Thanks!   FindRootCannotSolve.sm (5kb) downloaded 41 time(s).Edited by user 07 April 2016 21:47:21(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,647 Location: Italy Was thanked: 1329 time(s) in 875 post(s)
|
Hello Alex, I cannot reproduce... do you have Maxima or some other plugin that may cause the issue? ![2016-04-07 21_01_04-SMath Studio Desktop - [FindRootCannotSolve.sm_].png](/forum/resource.ashx?a=13456&b=2) |
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects |
|
|
|
|
|
  Rank: Administration Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,740  Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
|
Hello, It works for me. The same was mentioned some time ago here. It seems that some plugin is making trouble. I do not know which one.  Regards, Radovan |
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!" |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/03/2014(UTC) Posts: 418 Was thanked: 125 time(s) in 96 post(s)
|
Omorr, Davide:
- Uninstalling Maxima plugin did nothing
- Clean install of stable 0.98 SMath Studio solved the issue. Now I just need to find what other plugin is wreaking havoc there..
Thank you
|
1 user thanked Alex M. for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Maths are unitless, therefore plot first the generatrix to discover the function has no root(s). If you fabricate with a unit system, you will have no plot. That's what I call "invisible project" Jean 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
... the other point is that Smathh is too granular to
reveal the Gaussian part of the function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC) Posts: 296  Location: Khabarovsk, Russia Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Maths are unitless, therefore plot first the generatrix
to discover the function has no root(s). If you fabricate
with a unit system, you will have no plot. That's what I
call "invisible project" You make a wrong point here. You prefer to avoid using units in your sheets, and that's your right; but declaring that units are inappropriate (as you do now and again) is spreading FUD. Using units is a great feature of SMath (that is optional, so that you may choose to work as you like), but your unawareness of ways to take advantage from using units while keeping ability to, e.g., plotting, doesn't mean that it's good to state such bold claims (insted, you could simply create a new thread in "Questions" and ask others how to plot while using units).  Second, the function itself doesn't have roots, but original poster looked not for equation f(x)=0, but for f(x)=n, which is f(x)-n=0. Third, you mistakingly put square for pi (it was meant for seconds, not for pi - if you used units, you would katch this, because the result would arrive in s*Pa). Edited by user 08 April 2016 05:52:59(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
... maybe that's what you had 4800481^2 instead of 4800481 m^2... just different scale plot. Whatever, the negative branch has two symmetric complex roots. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Maths are unitless, end of it.
It would be fine in Smath if units would be decoration
but it's not in Smath 5346. From what Andery replied to
me, new versions have decoration style like Mathcad 11.
What do you put as units in Fourier, Laplace ...
In the Legendre Quadraature [Reconciliation] just posted
What's the unit of the cumulative integral ?
Answer: user "UnitGraphic".
So, we live it here.
Cheers, Jean
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC) Posts: 296 Location: Khabarovsk, Russia Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
|
|
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433  Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Maths are unitless, end of it. Jean, You tried really hard on the Mathcad forums to preach the same thing and was a huge detractor to your work ... which is quality collaboration and maths. Now, your preaching about graphing ... that is something worth "harping" on!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Quite right, the debate lasted for a while in the Mathsoft Collaboratory.
I defeated my detractors twice and for ever in this Colaboratory:
1. I put units in the Reynolds number [unitless] but got result that
none could decipher, even Mathsoft.
2. Doing some Plank physics, same thing: not decipherable.
The best was that no collab [to my recollection] posted advanced problems
with units. Use units in your profit but make sure you check unitless.
Units system is for personal use at arithmetic maths level.
Cheers, Jean
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,986 Was thanked: 1124 time(s) in 721 post(s)
|
 The Taylor() function throws the error message "Specify variable" How am I expected to do this? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
As it looks Martin, "Taylor" is by default. Jean 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,647 Location: Italy Was thanked: 1329 time(s) in 875 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: mkraska The Taylor() function throws the error message "Specify variable" How am I expected to do this? You assigned a wrong value for the 2nd argument, "2:variable". |
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,986 Was thanked: 1124 time(s) in 721 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Davide Carpi
You assigned a wrong value for the 2nd argument, "2:variable".
Hm, don't understand. For univariate expressions, the second argument is the development point. For multivariate expressions, I would expect that I have to specify the independent variable and the development point. In Maxima (not working in newer versions of SMath) it looks like this:  With your Taylor, I have this:  Sorry, I don't understand the result.  Analysis.sm (29kb) downloaded 40 time(s). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
