Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/09/2021(UTC) Posts: 66 Location: Adelaide Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 3 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Jean for the Gramm Schmidt POLYROOTS doc, i adjusted decimal points to 15 for the maple solve and got: -0.906181463330827 for one of the solves on pages 4, compared with the Smath solution of: -0.906181339783194 on page 3. No idea about accuracy of numbers, but thought i would just have a slightly deeper look, all the best, John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: johnspark Jean for the Gramm Schmidt POLYROOTS doc, i adjusted decimal points to 15 for the maple solve and got: -0.906181463330827 for one of the solves on pages 4, compared with the Smath solution of: -0.906181339783194 on page 3. No idea about accuracy of numbers, but thought i would just have a slightly deeper look, all the best, John The solve(4) organizes the roots in order, Maple not but OK for Lagrange. solve warrants at least 4 decimals, most of the times ~ 6. The note about solve(4) 4 decimals has been removed from the description. Just recently removed ... Thus missing for best guidance/disambiguation. Sad for the hale storm ... Be good ... Jean.
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.