Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login. New Registrations are disabled.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Jean Giraud  
#1 Posted : 23 October 2021 01:43:51(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
Solve POLYROOTS sort Complex.sm (10kb) downloaded 22 time(s).
Solve POLYROOTS Gramm_Schmidt.sm (45kb) downloaded 15 time(s).
Solve POLYROOTS Legendre.sm (46kb) downloaded 15 time(s).
Solve POLYROOTS Cubic solver.sm (72kb) downloaded 20 time(s).

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your SMath Studio Forum forum account. New Registrations are disabled.

Offline Jean Giraud  
#2 Posted : 23 October 2021 15:07:30(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
... refactored

Solve POLYROOTS sort Complex.sm (20kb) downloaded 13 time(s).
Offline johnspark  
#3 Posted : 30 October 2021 06:32:43(UTC)
johnspark


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/09/2021(UTC)
Posts: 66
Australia
Location: Adelaide

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Go to Quoted Post
Solve POLYROOTS sort Complex.sm (10kb) downloaded 22 time(s).
Solve POLYROOTS Gramm_Schmidt.sm (45kb) downloaded 15 time(s).
Solve POLYROOTS Legendre.sm (46kb) downloaded 15 time(s).
Solve POLYROOTS Cubic solver.sm (72kb) downloaded 20 time(s).



Jean for the Gramm Schmidt POLYROOTS doc, i adjusted decimal points to 15 for the maple solve and got: -0.906181463330827 for one of the solves on pages 4,
compared with the Smath solution of: -0.906181339783194 on page 3.


No idea about accuracy of numbers, but thought i would just have a slightly deeper look,

all the best,

John
Offline Jean Giraud  
#4 Posted : 30 October 2021 14:38:31(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
Originally Posted by: johnspark Go to Quoted Post
Jean for the Gramm Schmidt POLYROOTS doc, i adjusted decimal points to 15 for the maple solve and got: -0.906181463330827 for one of the solves on pages 4,
compared with the Smath solution of: -0.906181339783194 on page 3.
No idea about accuracy of numbers, but thought i would just have a slightly deeper look,
all the best,
John

The solve(4) organizes the roots in order, Maple not but OK for Lagrange.
solve warrants at least 4 decimals, most of the times ~ 6.
The note about solve(4) 4 decimals has been removed from the description.
Just recently removed ... Thus missing for best guidance/disambiguation.
Sad for the hale storm ... Be good ... Jean.

Polyroots.PNG
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.