Rank: Administration Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,616 Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 666 post(s)
|
SMath Studio - SMath
This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalized recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Tiny, but powerful mathematical program with WYSIWYG editor and complete units of measurements support.
It provides numerous computing features and rich user interface translated into about 40 different languages. Application also contains integrated mathematical reference book.
Free for personal usage! Plans for Organizations are available!
Application can be easily extended based on your needs. Built-in Extensions Manager tool allows to get access to hundreds official and third-party resources of the following types: usage examples, plug-ins, SMath Viewer based applications, snippets, interface translations, interactive books, handbooks and tutorials.
You should definitely try and use SMath Studio. This “one-man” project is really awesome. I can state, with no doubt, that every Mathcad user will be rather surprised.
more...
by Radovan Omorjan
Muy buena la aplicación. Ligera, potente y eficaz para lo que está diseñada. Es mi herramienta diaria para cálculos de Ingeniería Civil en Venezuela.
more...
by Kenny Silva
Es un programa excelente y muy útil para la enseñanza y aprendizaje en ing. Civil. Muy recomendable!!!
more...
by Wilson Rodríguez Calderón
|
5 users thanked Andrey Ivashov for this useful post.
|
on 07/11/2019(UTC), on 07/11/2019(UTC), on 07/11/2019(UTC), on 07/11/2019(UTC), on 08/11/2019(UTC)
|
|
Rank: Administration Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,616 Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 666 post(s)
|
This time I've spent many time on improvements of symbolic engine to make it more safe and predictable. To show some results I've made available equrep(3) function which is hidden from auto-completion list and other places. It demonstrates possibilities to manipulate with complex structure of different equations. I'm not sure if anyone interested in this function at all, but under the hood it is used almost for every calculation in the program. This function has three arguments: - First is a given equation (anything to manipulate with); - Second is an input for manipulation rule; - Third is an output of manipulation rule. In other words it allows to apply some manipulation (described in two last arguments) to an equation (from the first argument). Some examples: Do not forget to set Optimization=None if you want to see exact result without any extra numeric or symbolic optimization. Best regards.
|
3 users thanked Andrey Ivashov for this useful post.
|
on 07/11/2019(UTC), on 08/11/2019(UTC), on 08/11/2019(UTC)
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,980 Was thanked: 1120 time(s) in 718 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Andrey Ivashov This function has three arguments: - First is a given equation (anything to manipulate with); - Second is an input for manipulation rule; - Third is an output of manipulation rule.
In other words it allows to apply some manipulation (described in two last arguments) to an equation (from the first argument).
looks promising. Maybe, this might simplify restructuring of terms inside plugins. As it seems, the function does not preprocess it's first argument. The definition of c isn't during the call of eqnrep when running the sheet step by step. I see that the structure patterns should be unevaluated otherwise you would rely on having the variables therein being undefined in the sheet. How about a function or a flag enforcing preprocessing? equrep.sm (6kb) downloaded 18 time(s). |
|
1 user thanked mkraska for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,980 Was thanked: 1120 time(s) in 718 post(s)
|
Actually an equrep function with preprocessing can be made: equreppp.sm (18kb) downloaded 16 time(s). |
|
1 user thanked mkraska for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/06/2013(UTC) Posts: 50 Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 6 post(s)
|
С некоторых пор возникла проблема непечати некоторых элементов. Расчеты делаю в Вашей программе, затем вывожу на печать в формат PNG и вставляю результат в Word. Возникает проблема с блоками, отмеченных как "Запретить вычисление". Раньше над ними (в правом верхнем углу) был прямоугольник, сейчас они отмечены серым фоном. А с ним как раз и беда. Что можно сделать? На просмотре так:
На печати так:
Как видно не все блоки напечатаны, причем некоторые из нерасчетных были всё же напечатаны. Ранее (когда не было фона) таких проблем не возникало. Для печати использую виртуальный принтер pdf24. Стандартный экспорт в PNG формат не делит на страницы, так бы им пользовался (там кстати проблем нет). Пока вышел из ситуации с помощью скриншотов. Костыль конечно, но ничего не поделать. Edited by user 08 November 2019 21:47:42(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
|
Hi. An application for equrep: step by step derivatives. D.sm (15kb) downloaded 38 time(s).Best regards. Alvaro.
|
2 users thanked Razonar for this useful post.
|
on 11/11/2019(UTC), on 14/11/2019(UTC)
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
|
Another. isol.sm (43kb) downloaded 42 time(s).Best regards. Alvaro. Edited by user 14 November 2019 10:57:08(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
1 user thanked Razonar for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,868 Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
|
I don't understand the maple fake [isol]. Already such a superb companion to Smath.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
|
And another: laplace transform in native smath. laplace.pdf (155kb) downloaded 33 time(s). laplace.sm (85kb) downloaded 32 time(s).Best regards. Alvaro.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433 Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud I don't understand the maple fake [isol]. I like native. I wish items like Writer Region would go native too.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,639 Location: Italy Was thanked: 1323 time(s) in 873 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ElSid I wish items like Writer Region would go native too. That's in the plans, but it requires some new things and some refactoring before this step. |
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects |
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,868 Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ElSid I like native.I wish items like Writer Region would go native too. That means an extra icon in menu or special key. Finally: did you manage your translucent background ? Did you manage the *.PDF c/w the translucent like original ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433 Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
Alvaro or Jean, When Isolating in either the snippet or Maple, is there a way to force the symbolic engine? I tried using after some of the variables were defined (Yes, I used CTRL+=) and they both work prior to variable assignments. The issue is that many times, we define the variables and further down the calculation shows the equation ... that I'd like to manipulate. I tried setting optimization to none and symbolic, both failed
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433 Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud That means an extra icon in menu or special key. OK. Better documentation Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Finally: did you manage your translucent background ? Yes Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Did you manage the *.PDF c/w the translucent like original ? PNG and yes. The graphic I was sent had very rich colors, almost like the flowers in the example. It was hard to see the text/calculation
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 10/11/2010(UTC) Posts: 1,494 Was thanked: 1274 time(s) in 745 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud I don't understand the maple fake [isol] It’s better to turn off optimization to see the native maple answer. Edited by user 21 November 2019 20:48:22(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
Russia ☭ forever Viacheslav N. Mezentsev |
3 users thanked uni for this useful post.
|
on 21/11/2019(UTC), on 21/11/2019(UTC), on 21/11/2019(UTC)
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ElSid Alvaro or Jean, When Isolating in either the snippet or Maple, is there a way to force the symbolic engine? I tried using after some of the variables were defined (Yes, I used CTRL+=) and they both work prior to variable assignments. The issue is that many times, we define the variables and further down the calculation shows the equation ... that I'd like to manipulate. I tried setting optimization to none and symbolic, both failed Hi ElSid. I know that SMath carry the definitions instead the values, and with symbolics there are not an eval equivalent. But without an specific example, this is what I get Best regards. Alvaro.
|
1 user thanked Razonar for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433 Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
I forgot the screenshot due to a meeting! The space between the equations has some variables "defined". Maybe what I'm looking for is a feature request. I have the same issue with Maple plugin. Essentially, I'm transferring a hand calculation and wanted to show all the steps in order. It does not make sense to isolate and manipulate an equation that is not used for 3 pages ... it's out of sequence and out of context This screenshot is valid for both optimization=symbolic and none
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ElSid ... Maybe what I'm looking for is a feature request. I have the same issue with Maple plugin. ...
Hi ElSid. I guess that what you want is the 'x:=x' mathcad feature, which hide the value of x for the symbolic processor, but not for the numeric one. This is a mathcad 11 screenshot Best regards. Alvaro.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,868 Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
|
± You mentioned 'Native Smath' maple is not a plugin from Insert Menu, rather resident from f(x) menu. No need to scratch the right ear with the left hand. Further: your stuff must be tracable/accepted/visible.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 13/09/2011(UTC) Posts: 63 Location: Kolkata
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 9 post(s)
|
Hello Andrey and everyone, I wonder if, since equrep(3) now gives access to smath's internal representation it should be possible to get this "engineering" way of writing equations, discussed in many posts since many years, like here: https://en.smath.com/for...umbers-in-equations.aspxto summarise: a:=2 b:=pi p:=a*b ------------------- symbolic equation =2*3.14 ----------- equation with variables replaced by their values (with control of their format, accuracy, etc.) =6.28 -------------- numerical result This is a numerical equivalent of the visual control that was available to civil engineers at the time of graphics statics. It gives an immediate feel of the magnitude of values, their accuracy and relevance for the result. We can easily do as below: a:=2 b:=3 p:=a*b ----------------------------- (definition) equrep(p:=a*b,x,x)=2*3 ------------- (no optimisation) equrep(p:=a*b,x,x)=6 --------------- (numeric optimisation) and by not displaying input data: p:=a*b 2*3 6 However the middle equation becomes unreadable as soon as we have values that are not round numbers, so we also need to control the format of the values of variables in the middle equation, and to insert some "=" in-between. This is much beyond my ability! If anyone had some idea how to do something close to that, that would help some structural engineers! Thanks, Laurent Originally Posted by: Andrey Ivashov This time I've spent many time on improvements of symbolic engine to make it more safe and predictable.
To show some results I've made available equrep(3) function which is hidden from auto-completion list and other places. It demonstrates possibilities to manipulate with complex structure of different equations. I'm not sure if anyone interested in this function at all, but under the hood it is used almost for every calculation in the program.
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.