Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Britt1 Can you make a table in one SMath file, and have a calculation in another SMath file refer to the table in a calculation? SS 6179 does not save Table in file. Differently, a matrix data result does save and is lot more technical.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/03/2019(UTC) Posts: 73 Location: Mandeville, LA
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Originally Posted by: Britt1 Can you make a table in one SMath file, and have a calculation in another SMath file refer to the table in a calculation? SS 6179 does not save Table in file. Differently, a matrix data result does save and is lot more technical. How do I reference a matrix in another file?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/12/2011(UTC) Posts: 319 Location: italy Was thanked: 109 time(s) in 93 post(s)
|
you can check the features of the "include" plugin
sergio
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Britt1 How do I reference a matrix in another file? PipeData is spooled to file from where it is created, then recovered from wherever. It should create SmathFile in your C:\ root directory. If not => create it Inst_Colebrook Pipe Data_Recover.sm (5kb) downloaded 10 time(s). Inst_Colebrook Pipe Data.sm (60kb) downloaded 10 time(s).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/03/2019(UTC) Posts: 73 Location: Mandeville, LA
|
Why is SMath not recognizing the Matrix callout? table1.sm (14kb) downloaded 9 time(s).Edited by user 17 May 2019 21:57:57(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Britt1 Why is SMath not recognizing the Matrix callout? Table is a local decorative gadget, thus: not a matrix as such. Disambiguate: Smath spools to file a Matrix but not a Table.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC) Posts: 433 Location: USA Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Britt1 Why is SMath not recognizing the Matrix callout? table1.sm (14kb) downloaded 9 time(s). @Britt1, Did you get this to work? On my list of things to torture myself with. I have a spreadsheet for this, but like keeping everything, when reasonably possible, on one platform. Moving hard to QC spreadsheets to SMath is interesting to say the least . This has been on the back-burner as it's easy to check. I actually think this will be more complicated in SMath than it's worth, thus asking if you got something to look at
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2013(UTC) Posts: 1,126 Was thanked: 507 time(s) in 338 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ElSid Originally Posted by: Britt1 Why is SMath not recognizing the Matrix callout? table1.sm (14kb) downloaded 9 time(s). @Britt1, Did you get this to work? On my list of things to torture myself with. I have a spreadsheet for this, but like keeping everything, when reasonably possible, on one platform. Moving hard to QC spreadsheets to SMath is interesting to say the least . This has been on the back-burner as it's easy to check. I actually think this will be more complicated in SMath than it's worth, thus asking if you got something to look at Maybe I understood completely wrong what you are trying to do. But I have just deleted FU and rewrote it. The operand was # in your example, what it means? Regards Code: <input>
<e type="operand">FU</e>
<e type="operand">#</e>
<e type="operator" args="2">:</e>
</input>
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.