Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
SMath Studio 0.98.5990 (26 May 2016)
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
Offline Andrey Ivashov  
#1 Posted : 27 May 2016 00:54:20(UTC)
Andrey Ivashov


Rank: Administration

Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member
Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,617
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 1981 time(s) in 667 post(s)
SMath Studio 0.98.5990 available


Latest changes (against SMath Studio 0.98.5983)

  • SS-2301: Symbol 'i' can now be used as a function argument;
  • Function eval() improved to allow calculation of the functions inside definition even if function's arguments are undefined;
  • SS-2352: Pressing Insert Matrix button when part of expression is selected fixed;
  • SS-2349: Line breaks incorrectly shown in Dynamic Assistance;
  • SS-2351: IsDefined() function fixed for infinity and infinity now exists in Autocompletion list;
  • SS-2348: Crash on deleting result of calculation fixed;
  • Support for numbers started with decimal symbol improved inside MathRegion;
  • Calculation logic refactoring.


Download

Edited by user 27 May 2016 01:46:15(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified
Back to top
WWW
thanks 5 users thanked Andrey Ivashov for this useful post.
on 27/05/2016(UTC),  on 27/05/2016(UTC),  on 27/05/2016(UTC),  on 27/05/2016(UTC),  on 27/05/2016(UTC)

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your SMath Studio Forum forum accountor Register a new forum account.
Back to top  
Offline mikekaganski  
#2 Posted : 27 May 2016 01:09:56(UTC)
mikekaganski


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 296
Man
Russian Federation
Location: Khabarovsk, Russia

Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
I suppose it's 5990, not 5983 Good
Thanks for great news!
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski
Back to top
Offline Andrey Ivashov  
#3 Posted : 27 May 2016 01:46:33(UTC)
Andrey Ivashov


Rank: Administration

Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member
Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,617
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 1981 time(s) in 667 post(s)
Originally Posted by: mikekaganski Go to Quoted Post
I suppose it's 5990, not 5983 Good
Thanks for great news!

You're right Good Thank you!
Back to top
WWW
Offline mikekaganski  
#4 Posted : 27 May 2016 05:22:43(UTC)
mikekaganski


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 296
Man
Russian Federation
Location: Khabarovsk, Russia

Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
solvQerr.png

solvQerr.sm (10kb) downloaded 63 time(s).
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski
Back to top
Offline tomtit  
#5 Posted : 27 May 2016 16:58:52(UTC)
tomtit


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 22/02/2014(UTC)
Posts: 81

Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Hi Andrey,
It looks like maple plugin has a problem with 5990.
All my valuable symbolic calculations are broken.
For me, the last good version is 5973.
Please look what is wrong with this sample.
This time, it doesn't report x-not defined, but hangs forever ...
Thanks,
Igor
cic3-1.sm (8kb) downloaded 94 time(s).
Back to top
Offline Davide Carpi  
#6 Posted : 27 May 2016 17:32:45(UTC)
Davide Carpi


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,690
Man
Italy
Location: Italy

Was thanked: 1368 time(s) in 895 post(s)
I guess maple() function must be recompiled following this hint. Please be patient, it is a change that affects all the functions that deals with symbolic data.
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects
Back to top
Offline ElSid  
#7 Posted : 01 June 2016 22:02:08(UTC)
ElSid


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 433
Man
United States
Location: USA

Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
I found a bug in this version. Took over 5 minutes before I terminated the file. I took a snapshot with the timer running (shows 43 seconds) after Jean confirmed 5 seconds on his machine using version 5346.
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: ElSid Go to Quoted Post
Is this supposed to take over 5 minutes to calculate? May be SMath as this is the second sheet today that "locks-up" with the calculation tool bas and the timer running


Re-download in case something got wrong in the transmission.
XP Home, 1.8 GHz, Smath 5346 OFFicial release => 5 seconds

Jean

Inst_Viscosity Water.sm (53kb) downloaded 85 time(s).

Would be interesting more collabs test the timing, thanks.

Timer.PNG
Back to top
Offline mikekaganski  
#8 Posted : 02 June 2016 00:14:40(UTC)
mikekaganski


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 296
Man
Russian Federation
Location: Khabarovsk, Russia

Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
scrH51.png
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski
Back to top
Offline ElSid  
#9 Posted : 02 June 2016 19:35:56(UTC)
ElSid


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 433
Man
United States
Location: USA

Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
Mike,
Still seems like a computational bug. Mine went 5 minutes before I closed it down
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Go to Quoted Post
Re-download in case something got wrong in the transmission.
XP Home, 1.8 GHz, Smath 5346 OFFicial release => 5 seconds

Jean
Back to top
Offline mikekaganski  
#10 Posted : 03 June 2016 01:37:47(UTC)
mikekaganski


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 296
Man
Russian Federation
Location: Khabarovsk, Russia

Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ElSid Go to Quoted Post
Mike,
Still seems like a computational bug. Mine went 5 minutes before I closed it down


Yes, but is this truly SMath bug? Or some extension's? Did you try to investigate before writing "I found a bug" to the New Smath Version advertisement topic?

I have no maple/maxima on my system, could that be a thing?
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski
Back to top
Offline Jean Giraud  
#11 Posted : 03 June 2016 04:24:20(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 983 time(s) in 811 post(s)
Originally Posted by: mikekaganski Go to Quoted Post
Yes, but is this truly SMath bug? Or some extension's? Did you try to investigate before writing "I found a bug" to the New Smath Version advertisement topic?

I have no maple/maxima on my system, could that be a thing?



======================= I read you Mike ===========================

1. It may be a problem with local machine/OS ... conflict with others [I doubt].
2. Maybe with the Maxima solve block: solve(μT(t)-q(t),t,2,30) => disable the solve block.
3. Maple is not invoked in this attached document => eliminate Maple
4. With the symbolic Ah ! but only Smath symbolic.
-------- Thiele continued fraction Smath symbolic down to the plot => 4.5 sec
-------- Thiele continued fraction Smath numeric down to the plot => 0.5 sec
A thiele continued fraction calculates bottom to top [24 Aops ... Arithmetic operations]
This Thiele in Smath symbolic is in the range of 8 pages wide, my count 326 Aops

The μ350(x) is a J_Fraction equivalent to the continued fraction still existing in Maple.
It reduces the Aops [in this case down from 24 to 13. It computes faster as well as reported in C.T. Fikes [IBM of years 70]. I think I still have the algorithm of J_Frac,
in case some of you developpers would be interested.

The rational fractions [typical normalised Padé style] are expandable in J_Fraction,
but here again: Smath symbolic expands in horrible mess as the continued fraction.

The Newton-Wallis method is a way to compute continued fraction top to bottom.
My brain has diluted on this, maybe Mathcad as well.

Now, whoever wants: test and report versions to versions.

Cheers, Jean

Forum Compute Test.sm (26kb) downloaded 52 time(s).
Back to top
Offline ElSid  
#12 Posted : 03 June 2016 04:39:11(UTC)
ElSid


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 433
Man
United States
Location: USA

Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
Originally Posted by: mikekaganski Go to Quoted Post
Yes, but is this truly SMath bug? Or some extension's? Did you try to investigate before writing "I found a bug" to the New Smath Version advertisement topic?
I have no maple/maxima on my system, could that be a thing?
That was partial answer. I just upgraded to 5997 and there was an update to the Maple V wrapper. System went 14 seconds before I terminated it. I disabled the plugin and it took .98 rev 5997 0.760 seconds to process. Andrey fixed something in the new version as I was over 14 seconds with Maple disabled before. Sorry for not being clear before.
Back to top
Offline Jean Giraud  
#13 Posted : 03 June 2016 08:43:44(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 983 time(s) in 811 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ElSid Go to Quoted Post
That was partial answer.I just upgraded to 5997 and there was an update to the Maple V wrapper.System went 14 seconds before I terminated it.I disabled the plugin and it took .98 rev 5997 0.760 seconds to process.Andrey fixed something in the new version as I was over 14 seconds with Maple disabled before.Sorry for not being clear before.



Are you talking about

Forum Compute Test.sm (26kb) downloaded 58 time(s).

This document has nothing to do with Maple. I would be damned deceived if Smath couldn't
add 2+2 by itself. It just does from Windows resources. Are you the only user of the machine ? If not: kill all the birds around. In the attached work sheet, there are two
timing. So, which one are you talking about ?

Cheers, Jean.

Back to top
Offline Jean Giraud  
#14 Posted : 03 June 2016 09:17:53(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 983 time(s) in 811 post(s)
Oh ! there is another point, most important, like this: Some "modern users" have dual core, quadruple core.
That kills the compute engine [slows down]. There was a Mathsoft collab crying about Mathcad 11 takig minutes
to calculate a work sheet with his bomb dual core that mine, steam engine, computed in fraction of second.
Back to top
Offline ElSid  
#15 Posted : 03 June 2016 17:33:41(UTC)
ElSid


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 433
Man
United States
Location: USA

Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Go to Quoted Post
Are you talking about
Jean.
Nope. Same file as my original post to your file
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Go to Quoted Post
Inst_Viscosity Water.sm (53kb) downloaded 85 time(s).
Back to top
Offline Jean Giraud  
#16 Posted : 03 June 2016 19:24:41(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,866
Canada

Was thanked: 983 time(s) in 811 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ElSid Go to Quoted Post
Nope.Same file as my original post to your file


Elsid: please, recycle "Your file"
download the one "Forum, Compute test"

Jean
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET