Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login. New Registrations are disabled.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Davide Carpi  
#1 Posted : 03 March 2016 19:30:32(UTC)
Davide Carpi


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,639
Man
Italy
Location: Italy

Was thanked: 1323 time(s) in 873 post(s)
Confirmed. Considering that e and pi can be used as function's argument, IMHO should be considered a bug.

Edited by user 27 May 2016 14:07:36(UTC)  | Reason: marked as fixed

If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects
thanks 1 user thanked Davide Carpi for this useful post.
on 03/03/2016(UTC)

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your SMath Studio Forum forum account. New Registrations are disabled.

Offline Jean Giraud  
#2 Posted : 03 March 2016 20:43:13(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
Several months ago I reported that if 'i' imaginary
belongs to a function definition, 'i' can NOT be used
as index in program. Worst, the program runs but zombie.
Conflict/bug is cnfirmed. Toke me days to elucidate.

Jean
thanks 2 users thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
on 03/03/2016(UTC),  on 03/03/2016(UTC)
Offline omorr  
#3 Posted : 03 March 2016 21:15:52(UTC)
omorr


Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,740
Man
Serbia

Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
Please look at this link, for instance.

Regards,
Radovan


When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"
thanks 1 user thanked omorr for this useful post.
on 03/03/2016(UTC)
Offline omorr  
#4 Posted : 03 March 2016 21:25:32(UTC)
omorr


Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,740
Man
Serbia

Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ioan92 Go to Quoted Post
Thanks Radovan,

Nothing new under the sun, and Sisyphus is doing conscientiously his work...

Best Regards,
Ioan

You are welcome Ioan Good . It is important that our Sisyphus is in good health Wink

Regards,
Radovan
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"
thanks 2 users thanked omorr for this useful post.
on 03/03/2016(UTC),  on 03/03/2016(UTC)
Offline Davide Carpi  
#5 Posted : 03 March 2016 22:27:06(UTC)
Davide Carpi


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,639
Man
Italy
Location: Italy

Was thanked: 1323 time(s) in 873 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ioan92 Go to Quoted Post
Maybe we could think a way to solve, making periodically some synthesis or similar ?

I think that the BTS was thinked for this purpose, one may add a link to the discussion thread if is something discussed in the forum Good

Reading the link provided by Radovan seems there are strong reasons code side, still is something that may cause confusion because in the canvas i can be overriden... Umnik
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects
thanks 1 user thanked Davide Carpi for this useful post.
on 03/03/2016(UTC)
Offline Jean Giraud  
#6 Posted : 03 March 2016 22:35:55(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
... use (j,k,n) in lieu.
expx(i*x) [i imaginary] will crash Smath
if i [index] to collect exp(,)
thanks 1 user thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
on 03/03/2016(UTC)
Offline omorr  
#7 Posted : 04 March 2016 01:25:32(UTC)
omorr


Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,740
Man
Serbia

Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
Originally Posted by: ioan92 Go to Quoted Post
Radovan, Good

I think that it is not good at all if a lot of observations are lost over the time.
Many of this was obtained with much work.
For this simple history with "i" I spent a lot of time, making firstly reproaches to myself.
It is clear that such a work is not to be assigned to Andrey. He gives us too much of himself.
After many years, the volume of the forum is big enough, being almost impossible to look inside for each problem.
Maybe we could think a way to solve, making periodically some synthesis or similar ?

Best Regards,
Ioan



Hello Ioan,

I do not know how to do this right way, but during all these years I think this is inevitable. We are just forgetting things and rediscover them again, and there might be expected to be that way. Speaking for myself, it happens to me quite often (maybe because I am not getting any younger Wink ) . I agree that the volume of this Forum is quite large, lots of similar things are scattered all over the topics, and I really do not know how to put some order or synthesis of it, as you said.

Regards,
Radovan
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"
thanks 1 user thanked omorr for this useful post.
on 04/03/2016(UTC)
Offline Jean Giraud  
#8 Posted : 04 March 2016 08:11:48(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
Originally Posted by: omorr Go to Quoted Post
I do not know how to do this right way, but during all these years I think this is inevitable. We are just forgetting things and rediscover them again, and there might be expected to be that way. Speaking for myself, it happens to me quite often (maybe because I am not getting any younger ) . I agree that the volume of this Forum is quite large, lots of similar things are scattered all over the topics, and I really do not know how to put some order or synthesis of it, as you said.


Radovan !!!

You are number 1 +++ WebMaster. You can trust me from 10 years Mathsoft Collaboratory.
Their forum was not bad searching by: keyword, by date, by name. Since I joined, nothing
was left unattended or not doctored in one way or another. Real user needing help will
come back after re-thinking for a better targeted question.

Cheers, Jean

thanks 2 users thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
on 04/03/2016(UTC),  on 04/03/2016(UTC)
Offline Jean Giraud  
#9 Posted : 04 March 2016 08:24:41(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
.... "i as an arguent in function" is simply not documented.
"i" is by defunition the imaginary. Naturally it can't be
used otherwise except within the core of a program as long
as there is no complex stuff in the work sheet.
Sierpinski from today "Uni" is all correct from educated
know how [Ah ! the learning curve ]. Albert Einstein
missed twice his entry to University. Why not some of us ?

Jean
thanks 2 users thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
on 04/03/2016(UTC),  on 04/03/2016(UTC)
Offline mikekaganski  
#10 Posted : 06 April 2016 23:20:58(UTC)
mikekaganski


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 296
Man
Russian Federation
Location: Khabarovsk, Russia

Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
When i is used inside functions, it disallows the function to correctly process complex numbers (without redefining i outside the function):

scr17.png
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski
Offline Jean Giraud  
#11 Posted : 07 April 2016 03:09:56(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
Originally Posted by: mikekaganski Go to Quoted Post
When i is used inside functions,
it disallows the function to correctly process complex numbers
(without redefining i outside the function):


Quite right Mike, in numericals we have to learn few things
like learning alphabet. It made me shit bricks while working
the Laplace in closed control loops... i:=sqrt(-1)

Jean

Offline Andrey Ivashov  
#12 Posted : 26 May 2016 20:35:39(UTC)
Andrey Ivashov


Rank: Administration

Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member
Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,616
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 666 post(s)
Question related to using "i" as function's argument reviewed.
Now it is possible. New nightly build will be available soon.
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.