Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login. New Registrations are disabled.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline omorr  
#1 Posted : 09 October 2009 04:04:52(UTC)
omorr


Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,740
Man
Serbia

Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
Please look at the picture:

A function defined with "if" can not be integreated. "int" does not like "if" Mad . Could they like each other? Kiss

Regards,
Radovan
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your SMath Studio Forum forum account. New Registrations are disabled.

Offline Greg Locock  
#2 Posted : 10 October 2009 08:57:06(UTC)
Greg Locock


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/08/2009(UTC)
Posts: 52
Location: Australia

And here is some odd behaviour.



http://smath.info/wiki/G...File=gregpics%5cfbug.jpg
pic

Edited by user 10 October 2009 09:07:32(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline omorr  
#3 Posted : 10 October 2009 17:03:22(UTC)
omorr


Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,740
Man
Serbia

Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
As Greg pointed out, something is wrong.

It seems that the direct calculation of the expression which includes relational operation will be OK. I tried it directly and the transformed form as well (yellow tooltip).

Plotting and calling the defined function containing relational operators will go wrong sometimes (plotting, calling or both). I can not see the pattern.
Here is another text example.


Regards,
Radovan

Edited by user 18 October 2009 13:44:44(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"
Offline omorr  
#4 Posted : 17 October 2009 21:10:58(UTC)
omorr


Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,740
Man
Serbia

Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
omorr wrote:

It seems that the direct calculation of the expression which includes relational operation will be OK.

It seems I was wrong. Here is the example where the summation with relational operation fails:

Additionally:
x←10
sum((k^2*(k≤x));k;0;10)=1
Regards,
Radovan

Edited by user 17 October 2009 21:16:53(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"
Offline Andrey Ivashov  
#5 Posted : 18 October 2009 05:02:04(UTC)
Andrey Ivashov


Rank: Administration

Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member
Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,616
Man
Russian Federation

Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 666 post(s)
Bug with boolean operators fixed:


You can check this fix here: Alpha: SMath Studio 0.85.3578 (18 October 2009).

Edited by user 18 October 2009 07:19:24(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline omorr  
#6 Posted : 18 October 2009 13:55:46(UTC)
omorr


Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,740
Man
Serbia

Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
Thanks Andrey Good

The Xcas plugin will be very welcome. I hope the desktop version will come soon.

Regards,
Radovan

Edited by user 18 October 2009 19:22:20(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!"
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.